About Saya Scam Watch — Editorial Standards & Methodology

Who Publishes This Advisory

Why This Advisory Exists

The Saya Raj Nagar Extension corridor in Ghaziabad has become a hotbed of unauthorised EOI collection under the Saya brand. Buyers searching for information about these offerings encounter almost exclusively broker-controlled SEO content that promotes the project without disclosing the active court stay, the criminal FIR, or Saya Group's own denial of involvement.

This advisory exists to fill that information gap. Every claim published here is grounded in verifiable public records — court orders, FIRs, statutory notices, and official correspondence. We explicitly invite readers to verify every assertion through the independent sources linked on each page.

The facts speak for themselves: the court orders are public record, the FIR is public record, the Saya Group denial letter is on the court file, and the Times of India public notice was published in a national newspaper. This site simply makes those facts accessible to the buyers who need them most.

Editorial Methodology — How We Verify Every Claim

Every assertion published on this site falls into one of four categories, with verification standards for each:

1. Court records and FIRs — taken directly from certified or attested copies of court orders and police records. Citations include case number, date, court, and key paragraph reference where applicable. We do not paraphrase legal language without checking the original.
2. Public statutory filings — RERA registry status, MCA LLP master data, public notices, registered partnership deeds. These are taken directly from the relevant government portal or registry and dated.
3. Buyer reports — submitted through the report form on this site or referred by buyers in NCR property groups. Personal details (full name, full phone number, email) are redacted before publication. We do not pay for, solicit only-negative, or filter buyer submissions. Every report received is published in summarised form.
4. Editorial analysis — clearly distinguished from factual claims (e.g. "broker tactics include…", "the pattern across reports suggests…"). Analysis is grounded in the underlying records but represents our interpretation, not legal advice.

What we do not publish

• Speculation about parties' intent without documentary basis
• Personal information about brokers or buyers without express consent
• Claims we cannot back to a verifiable source
• Photographs or recordings obtained without consent
• Content that could prejudice the ongoing arbitration or criminal investigation
• Live Hindustan coverage — livehindustan.com — independent Hindi news coverage of the dispute

How to Verify Our Claims Independently

Every meaningful claim on this site is independently verifiable. Here is how:

• Court orders — search the Allahabad High Court case status portal (allahabadhighcourt.in) for Appeal No. 34/2026; request certified copies from Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar for Arbitration Case No. 06/2026.
• FIR No. 33/2026 — file an RTI application to PS Madhuban Bapudham, Ghaziabad; the FIR is also visible on the UP Police eFIR portal.
• Saya Group denial — the legal reply dated 27 January 2026 is part of the court file; obtainable from the court record.
• Times of India public notice — searchable in the TOI Delhi epaper archive of 13 February 2026.
• 2013 Partnership Deed — registered document obtainable from the Sub-Registrar's office, Ghaziabad.
• SAYA PROMOTERS LLP details — search MCA portal (mca.gov.in) for the LLP name to view designated partner details and registered office.
• UP-RERA registration status — search up-rera.in for any project containing "Saya", "Morta" or "Duhai". No matching registration exists.
• Saya Group's own project portfolio — visit Saya Group's official website (the actual Saya Group website) to confirm no Raj Nagar Extension or Duhai project is listed.

If our characterisation of any document differs materially from the source, we want to know. Use the contact form on the homepage or email the public-awareness team.

Corrections and Disputes Policy

This site is a living document. If you believe any factual claim is inaccurate, incomplete or misrepresented:

1. Submit a correction request through the contact form on the homepage with the specific claim, the correct version, and supporting documentation
2. We commit to reviewing within 5 working days and either updating the content, providing reasoning for the original wording, or noting your objection on the page where the disputed claim appears
3. For parties named on this site who believe they have been mischaracterised: send a formal communication via the contact form; we will respond through appropriate channels and document the correspondence
4. For contested factual claims, our default response is to add the disputing party's stated position alongside our original wording, allowing readers to weigh both

We will not silently delete or alter content under pressure without due process.

Limitations of This Advisory

For the avoidance of doubt:

• This site is not legal advice. Buyers should consult qualified counsel before drawing legal conclusions or initiating proceedings.
• This site cannot guarantee outcomes. Whether a buyer recovers EOI funds, whether SAYA PROMOTERS LLP is held criminally liable, whether the underlying arbitration concludes in any particular way — these are matters for the courts to determine.
• This site does not name individual buyers or brokers in the published reviews. Identifying details are redacted to protect privacy and avoid potential defamation exposure.
• This site does not allege specific criminal conduct by any individual beyond what is on the public record (i.e. the FIR is against M/s S.S. Builders Unit-1; the Saya Group denial is a documented legal filing). Individual broker conduct is described categorically based on aggregated buyer reports.
• This site is published in good faith based on the public record as of April 2026. The legal proceedings are ongoing, and any future developments — including possible reversal of court orders, RERA registration of a project, or settlement of the underlying dispute — will be reflected in updates.

Contact

For corrections, additional evidence submissions, media queries, or buyer-group connections:

• Confidential reporting: use the report form on the homepage
• Buyer reviews: use the review submission form on the reviews page
• Refund recovery questions: see the refund help guide
• Legal documents: see the evidence vault
• General queries: use the report form on the homepage for any queries

🔍 Verify These Claims Independently

Every claim on this site is independently verifiable through official sources. We list them here so readers can confirm the underlying facts directly:

• UP-RERA project registry — up-rera.in — search "Saya", "Morta" or "Duhai" to confirm no project registration exists for this land
• Allahabad High Court case status — allahabadhighcourt.in — search Appeal No. 34/2026 to verify the order refusing vacation of stay (17 February 2026)
• eCourts services portal — services.ecourts.gov.in — search Arbitration Case No. 06/2026, Commercial Court-II Gautam Buddh Nagar
• MCA21 portal — LLP Master Data — mca.gov.in — search "SAYA PROMOTERS LLP" to view designated partners and registered office
• UP Police citizen portal (eFIR & case lookup) — uppolice.gov.in — verify FIR No. 33/2026 at PS Madhuban Bapudham, Ghaziabad
• Times of India e-paper archive — epaper.timesofindia.com — Delhi edition, 13 February 2026, public notice page
• Saya Group's actual website — Saya Group's official website — confirm no Raj Nagar Extension or Duhai project is listed in their official portfolio
• UP Bhulekh land records — upbhulekh.gov.in — pull Khatauni for Village Morta to verify ownership and encumbrance status
• National Consumer Helpline — call 1915 or visit consumerhelpline.gov.in for free advisory
• Indian Kanoon — indiankanoon.org — case law database for cross-referencing the legal basis of refund claims under RERA Act 2016

Continue Reading