Saya Raj Nagar Extension EOI Scam — Court Orders, FIR & Saya Group Denial (Evidence Vault)
Every claim made on this site is grounded in verifiable court records, criminal FIRs, statutory notices, and official correspondence. This page is the consolidated evidence vault — chronological, with source citations, and links to certified copies wherever available. Buyers, journalists and legal counsel are invited to verify each document independently.
file: /assets/saya-raj-nagar-extension-court-orders.jpg (1200×700)Document 1 — Allahabad High Court Order Refusing Vacation of Stay
⚖️ Allahabad High Court — Appeal No. 34/2026
The Allahabad High Court heard arguments from both sides in Appeal No. 34/2026 challenging the Commercial Court's interim stay. The Hon'ble bench declined to vacate the Commercial Court's interim stay on the disputed Village Morta land and directed expeditious disposal of the underlying matter within one month. The stay on all transactions of the disputed land remains firmly in place.
Document 2 — Commercial Court-II Ad-Interim Injunction
⚖️ Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar — Arbitration Case No. 06/2026
The Presiding Officer passed a sweeping order: status quo on all disputed land in Village Morta, and a complete ban on selling, transferring, alienating, mortgaging, leasing or creating any third-party interest on the listed Khasra numbers. This is the foundational order that triggered the High Court appeal and the criminal FIR. The list of restricted Khasras in this order is the definitive boundary of which land cannot legally be transacted.
Document 3 — Times of India Public Notice (13 February 2026)
📰 Public Notice — Times of India, Delhi Edition
A formal public notice appeared in the Times of India warning the general public, developers, investors, dealers and brokers about transactions on the disputed Village Morta land. The notice cited the Commercial Court order, listed the restricted Khasra numbers, and explicitly stated that any party transacting on this land does so against an active court restraint and at their own legal peril.
Document 4 — Saya Group's Official Denial Letter
📝 Saya Group Legal Reply — 27 January 2026
Through advocate Yachana of the Delhi High Court, the Saya Group entities formally denied all allegations. The reply specifically claims:
- "No privity of contract" between Saya Group and the disputed land arrangement
- "Complete strangers" to the partnership deed governing the disputed parcel
- No authorisation given to any third party to use the Saya brand for the project
This is arguably the single most important document on this page. Saya Group itself — the brand whose name is being used in broker pitches — has formally said it has nothing to do with this project. Yet SAYA PROMOTERS LLP (whose partners are Vikas Bhasin and Anu Bhasin) continues to collect EOI cheques. The contradiction between the legal denial and the ongoing collection is at the heart of the scam.
Document 5 — Criminal FIR No. 33/2026
🚔 FIR No. 33/2026 — PS Madhuban Bapudham, Ghaziabad
FIR registered against M/s S.S. Builders Unit-1 and its partners for offences including:
- Fraud
- Criminal breach of trust
- Dishonest misappropriation of funds
- Illegally retaining original sale deeds
- Criminal conspiracy
All offences are under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (the criminal code that replaced the IPC). The FIR establishes that the original landowners — M/s S.S. Builders Unit-1 — allegedly attempted to deal with land already encumbered by the 2013 partnership deed with KW Group, and to collect monies on the disputed parcel from third parties.
Document 6 — Original 2013 Agreement for Partnership Deed
📜 Agreement for Partnership Deed — 2 March 2013
The foundational document establishing KW Group's legitimate development rights over the Village Morta land. The 2013 agreement vested development rights with KW Group and is the basis on which KW Group filed the Section 9 petition that obtained the Commercial Court's interim protection in January 2026. The arbitration matter currently underway centres on enforcement and interpretation of this agreement.
How to Verify These Saya Raj Nagar Extension Documents Independently
- Allahabad HC order — search the Allahabad High Court case status portal for Appeal No. 34/2026 and the order dated 17 February 2026.
- Commercial Court order — request a certified copy from Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar in Arbitration Case No. 06/2026.
- Times of India notice — TOI Delhi edition print archive, 13 February 2026. Searchable in the TOI epaper archive.
- Saya Group denial letter — part of the court file in Arbitration Case No. 06/2026; obtainable from the court record.
- FIR No. 33/2026 — file an RTI application with PS Madhuban Bapudham, Ghaziabad. The FIR is also visible on the UP Police eFIR portal.
- 2013 Partnership Deed — registered document obtainable from the Sub-Registrar's office, Ghaziabad.
Every document referenced on this site is verifiable through public record. We encourage independent verification — that is what distinguishes this advisory from broker SEO content.
What to Do If You Have Additional Evidence
If you have copies of broker WhatsApp pitches, EOI receipts from SAYA PROMOTERS LLP, "unit confirmation slips", undelivered allotment letters, or any other documentation of the Saya Raj Nagar Extension scam, we would like to add it to this evidence vault (with personal details redacted). Submit your evidence here or contact the public-awareness team via the report form.
🔍 Verify These Claims Independently
Every claim on this site is independently verifiable through official sources. We list them here so readers can confirm the underlying facts directly:
- UP-RERA project registry — up-rera.in — search "Saya", "Morta" or "Duhai" to confirm no project registration exists for this land
- Allahabad High Court case status — allahabadhighcourt.in — search Appeal No. 34/2026 to verify the order refusing vacation of stay (17 February 2026)
- eCourts services portal — services.ecourts.gov.in — search Arbitration Case No. 06/2026, Commercial Court-II Gautam Buddh Nagar
- MCA21 portal — LLP Master Data — mca.gov.in — search "SAYA PROMOTERS LLP" to view designated partners and registered office
- UP Police citizen portal (eFIR & case lookup) — uppolice.gov.in — verify FIR No. 33/2026 at PS Madhuban Bapudham, Ghaziabad
- Times of India e-paper archive — epaper.timesofindia.com — Delhi edition, 13 February 2026, public notice page
- Saya Group's actual website — sayahomes.com — confirm no Raj Nagar Extension or Duhai project is listed in their official portfolio
- UP Bhulekh land records — upbhulekh.gov.in — pull Khatauni for Village Morta to verify ownership and encumbrance status
- National Consumer Helpline — call 1915 or visit consumerhelpline.gov.in for free advisory
- Indian Kanoon — indiankanoon.org — case law database for cross-referencing the legal basis of refund claims under RERA Act 2016
Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I see the actual Saya Raj Nagar Extension court order?
The Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar order in Arbitration Case No. 06/2026 dated 30 January 2026 and the Allahabad High Court order in Appeal No. 34/2026 dated 17 February 2026 are both public records. Certified copies can be obtained from the respective courts. Once we host the certified PDFs, they will appear inline on this page.
Is FIR No. 33/2026 against Saya Group?
No. FIR No. 33/2026 is registered against M/s S.S. Builders Unit-1 and its partners — the original landowners alleged to have attempted to sell court-restrained land. The FIR is not against Saya Group. Saya Group has separately denied involvement in the disputed project through its own legal reply.
Has Saya Group really denied involvement in Saya Raj Nagar Extension?
Yes. Through advocate Yachana of the Delhi High Court, Vikas Bhasin, Saya Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Saya Buildcon Consortium Pvt. Ltd. filed a formal legal reply on 27 January 2026 denying any involvement. The reply uses the phrases 'no privity of contract' and 'complete strangers' to describe their relationship with the disputed land arrangement.
How do I get a copy of the Times of India public notice?
The notice was published in the Times of India Delhi edition on 13 February 2026. It is searchable in the TOI epaper archive of that date and was also reproduced as a press release. We will host a scan once final permissions are confirmed.
What does the 2013 Partnership Deed have to do with this?
The Agreement for Partnership Deed dated 2 March 2013 is the document that vested development rights over the Village Morta land in KW Group. It is the foundation of KW Group's legal claim and the basis on which the Section 9 petition was filed in January 2026, which in turn produced the Commercial Court's interim restraint order.
Are these documents being interpreted correctly on this site?
Yes — all summaries on this page reflect the operative content of the underlying legal records. We encourage independent verification through the certified copies and recommend that buyers consult qualified legal counsel before drawing their own legal conclusions. This site does not provide legal advice.