⚠️ Disputed land under Allahabad High Court proceedings + Commercial Court status-quo order. Verify before paying any EOI for Saya Raj Nagar Extension. Report an issue →
Public Court Record · Updated June 2026

The Saya Raj Nagar Extension Court Record — Read the Documents Yourself

This page collects the primary documents concerning the disputed land at Village Morta, Ghaziabad, marketed as "Saya Raj Nagar Extension." Each is a court order, an FIR, or official correspondence. We describe each document in neutral terms and link the full file so you can read it directly and draw your own conclusions.

⚖️ Commercial Court status-quo order🏛️ Allahabad HC appeal🚔 FIR registered📑 Court-directed FIR vs Saya Promoter LLP

How to Read This Page

The dispute has two distinct strands, and keeping them separate matters:

  • The land dispute — a partnership and development-rights dispute over the Village Morta land (Khasra numbers listed in the orders below). This is the subject of the Commercial Court status-quo order, the Allahabad High Court appeal, and FIR No. 33/2026.
  • The buyers' money — separately, a Ghaziabad court has directed registration of an FIR against Saya Promoter LLP and named partners, following a buyer's complaint that he paid an EOI for a project on this same land. Saya Homes Pvt. Ltd. has, in its own reply, denied any involvement in the land arrangements.

We do not ask you to take our word for any of this. Every document below is provided in full.

The Primary Documents

1. Commercial Court Status-Quo Order — 30 January 2026

Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh NagarArbitration Case No. 06/2026Section 9, Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996

In a petition filed by K.W. Buildcons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., the Court directed the respondents (M/s S.S. Builders & Ors.) to maintain status quo and restrained them from selling, transferring, alienating, mortgaging, leasing, encumbering or creating any third-party interest in the disputed land bearing Khasra Nos. 808, 809, 810, 820, 831, 832, 788, 814, 816, 818, 817, 830 and 811, 812, 813, 819, 821, 822 in Village Morta, Pargana Ghaziabad.

📄 Read the full order (PDF)

2. Allahabad High Court Order — 17 February 2026

High Court of Judicature at AllahabadAppeal No. 34/2026 (under Section 37)Before Hon'ble S.D. Singh, J. & Hon'ble Indrajeet Shukla, J.

M/s S.S. Builders & 7 Others appealed the 30 January 2026 injunction. The High Court disposed of the appeal and left it open to the appellant to file objections together with an application to vacate the interim injunction before the Commercial Court, which was asked to decide that application expeditiously. The High Court expressly declined to record any finding affecting the merits, and the interim injunction was left in place pending the trial court's decision.

📄 Read the full order (PDF)

3. FIR No. 33/2026 — 8 February 2026

P.S. Madhuban Bapudham, GhaziabadBNS 2023 — Sections 318(4), 61(2), 351(2)Complainant: authorised signatory, K.W. Buildcons Pvt. Ltd.

An FIR was registered on a complaint concerning the Memorandum of Understanding dated 2 March 2013 over the Village Morta land, and the alleged attempt to create third-party rights in that land. The FIR names M/s S.S. Builders Unit-1 and its partners. It relates to the land/partnership dispute and is provided here in full.

📄 Read the full FIR (PDF)

4. Saya's Reply to Legal Notice — 27 January 2026

Through Advocate, Delhi High CourtOn behalf of Vikas Bhasin, Saya Homes Pvt. Ltd. & Saya Buildcon Consortium Pvt. Ltd.

Saya's reply states they "categorically deny each and every allegation," describe themselves as "complete strangers" to the arrangements, deny being parties to or bound by the MoU dated 2 March 2013, and state they "have not, as of date, entered into any arrangement regarding the referenced land." We reproduce Saya's reply so you can read their stated position directly, in their own words.

📄 Read Saya's reply (PDF)

5. Ghaziabad Court Order Directing Registration of an FIR — 19 June 2026

Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Court-6), GhaziabadApplication No. 135/2026, Section 173(4) BNSSComplainant: a buyer (Anirudh Pasbola)

Following a buyer's complaint, the Court directed P.S. Nandgram to register an FIR against Saya Promoter LLP (through its partner), its Managing Partner Vikas Bhasin, and other named partners and associates. The order records the buyer's account that he paid an EOI of ₹1,00,000 by cheque to "Saya Promoters LLP" for a Raj Nagar Extension project, and later found the land (the same Khasra numbers) under court stay and not registered with UP-RERA, with the documents shown to him alleged to be forged. The Court held that the facts disclosed a prima facie cognizable offence and directed investigation. This is a court order; the allegations in it remain to be investigated.

📄 Read the full order (PDF)

Public Notices in National Newspapers

Formal Public Notices and Legal Cautions concerning the disputed land have been published in several national newspapers (Dainik Bhaskar, Amar Ujala, Dainik Jagran, Jansatta, Punjab Kesari, Hindustan Times and Hindustan) between May and June 2026. They are collected on the public notices page.

📰 View all public notices → 📥 Download the notices (PDF)

🔍 Verify Every Document Independently

  • Allahabad High Courtallahabadhighcourt.in — Appeal No. 34/2026
  • eCourts servicesservices.ecourts.gov.in — Arbitration Case No. 06/2026, Gautam Buddh Nagar
  • UP-RERAup-rera.in — search for any registration under "Saya"
  • UP Bhulekhupbhulekh.gov.in — verify Village Morta Khasra records
  • MCA portalmca.gov.in — entity details for the LLP and companies named in the documents

Note: An FIR and a court direction to register an FIR are records of allegations that are pending investigation; they are not findings of guilt. We present the documents so readers can review the public record and verify it for themselves.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a court stay on the Saya Raj Nagar Extension land?

Yes. The Commercial Court-II, Gautam Buddh Nagar, passed a status-quo order on 30 January 2026 in Arbitration Case No. 06/2026, restraining the respondents from selling, transferring, or creating any third-party interest in the disputed Village Morta land. The order can be read in full on this page.

What did the Allahabad High Court decide?

In Appeal No. 34/2026 (order dated 17 February 2026), the High Court disposed of the appeal against the injunction and left it open to the appellant to file objections and a vacation application before the Commercial Court. The interim injunction was left in place; the High Court expressly declined to record any finding on the merits. The full order is available below.

Has any FIR been registered in connection with this land?

Two documents on this page are relevant. FIR No. 33/2026 (PS Madhuban Bapudham, 8 February 2026) was registered on a complaint concerning the disputed Village Morta land. Separately, on 19 June 2026 a Ghaziabad court directed the police to register an FIR against Saya Promoter LLP and named partners, following a buyer's complaint. Both documents are linked below for you to read directly.

What is Saya Group's position?

Saya Homes Pvt. Ltd., through their advocate, issued a reply dated 27 January 2026 stating they 'categorically deny each and every allegation' and describing themselves as 'complete strangers' to the land arrangements. Saya's reply is reproduced on this page so you can read their position in their own words.

Can I verify these documents myself?

Yes, and you should. Each document is a court record or official correspondence that can be independently verified through the Allahabad High Court portal, the eCourts services portal, the UP-RERA portal, and the respective newspaper e-paper archives. Verification links are provided alongside each document.